Issue No 59, September 14-20, 2003 | ISSN:1684-2057 | satribune.com

Innovesia - International Savings Program

Opinion

 

Musharraf, Jamali Coming to US with Differing Agendas

By Shaheen Sehbai

WASHINGTON: Caught in the quagmire of persistently elusive political legitimacy at home, Pakistan’s General Pervez Musharraf has leaned on his relations with the US and the West to seek recognition. His only claim and justification to continue staying in power has been Pakistan’s complex geostrategic situation and its imperatives for the West’s war on terrorism.

So while he was accepted and promoted as their closest ally in this war, Musharraf tried his best for almost a year to achieve some degree of legitimacy at home. He appears to have failed. His dubious referendum to elect him as President has not been recognized by the established political forces, his amendments in the Constitution have been continuously rejected and his house of cards built with borrowed, purchased and coerced political loyalties has not provided him any cause for comfort. He is a man with his legs in two boats with the waters getting rougher by the day.

These are the ground realities which even the closest of Musharraf supporters abroad are now forced to consider. They now believe Musharraf cannot sustain this fragile structure for long. The balancing act could flounder any moment. Washington and the West have to look for alternatives and be ready with some when they need them.

Their obvious first stop is to test the political set up which presents itself as elected and representative, the doubts about its creation and genuineness notwithstanding. Whatever one may say, the elected leadership has taken principled stands and refused to surrender to Army’s never ending political ambitions. Even the coalition partners of General Musharraf have been urging him quietly to agree to concessions for the sake of sustaining his own system. They realize that the alternatives would be disastrous not just for Musharraf but for his supporters as well.

In the middle of this situation comes the invitation from Washington to Prime Minister Jamali to come for his postponed official visit to the White House. Coming back to back with repeated Musharraf visits, it becomes rather obvious that Washington is looking for alternatives and is in a bit of a hurry as well.

The aura of invincibility around General Musharraf is thus crumbling. It is giving way to a search for other options in Pakistan. The US media too has picked up the vibes and started blaming Musharraf for not being able to deliver what he has been promising. Mainstream newspapers as New York Times, Washington Post, Christian Science Monitor and several others have come out with damning reports.

Even US Ambassador in Pakistan, Nancy Powell, has joined the chorus, although her complaint was packaged in a sugar coated pill. This is what she told the Indian "Business Standard": ""It is a mystery to us how the Washington Post, the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal can find the Taliban in Quetta and the Pakistan government cannot."

Musharraf’s strategists have found the going so tough they have launched major diversionary campaigns at home. Both the relations with India and the controversial water issues in Pakistan are being used for this purpose with desperate eagerness. The problem is that the more Musharraf tries to convince the Pakistani people that he is needed to resolve these long standing and critical issues, the more an impression is created that he is the main roadblock in their resolution.

The relations with India are a classic example. The more Musharraf presses New Delhi for resumption of the dialogue, the rogue elements of his Army and intelligence agencies subvert him with greater vengeance. This brings the Indian leadership back to the point where they question Musharraf’s credibility, he being the architect of Kargil and, according to Benazir Bhutto, planner of many more adventures, including an attack on Srinagar. The Indian objections have forced even Washington to raise their voice against cross border terrorism in Kashmir. Musharraf’s vacillating positions on key members of Al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden have added more weight to voices doubting his credibility.

Domestically his attempts to gain sympathies of Punjab by advocating the cause of Kalabagh Dam have also been counter productive. His own coalition partners, especially from Sindh and NWFP have spoken out loud against his desperate bid to shift the focus of battle from his legitimacy to sharing of waters. Now he has given a deadline of June 2004 saying he will decide by then what to do.

This is again going to hurt him more than help him. The domestic Opposition will now rally not just on constitutional issues against him but will suck in all those who are opposed to the Punjab position on key water issues. Musharraf’s self-proclaimed position as the sole arbiter of all these complex and life-and-death issues for various provinces has never been, and will never be, accepted. Why should provinces depend on his judgment when no one knows how long he will be there and what chaos may be unleashed once he is gone.

Prime Minister Jamali has in such a situation done well by keeping his profile at the lowest, publicly accepting Musharraf as his boss and telling the world that he should not be held responsible for any of the decisions which are being taken.

But this position may change when Washington starts talking directly to Jamali as a possible alternate. Mr. Jamali has now to convince the Bush Administration and Congress that he could do a better job by creating a political consensus on contentious issues and bringing liberal and moderate political forces on board. That is why he has indicated that he would travel to Washington after consulting with Opposition parties. This would not have been liked by General Musharraf a bit.

The tragedy is that Musharraf who was popular when he arrived on the scene, was acceptable as a civilian leader to almost everybody had he agreed to become an elected president, is now a liability for every one. Questions about how much support he enjoys within the Army are being raised and when he answers these questions with chest-thumping claims that every one was behind him, he looks more unconvincing. Recent arrests of middle ranking Army officers belie his claims. He has no option but to keep making these claims and keep living a life which is planned and protected on a day to day basis.

Practically Musharraf cannot, and does not trust any one. Even mobile telephones of his own coalition MPs in Punjab were confiscated by his security agencies when he recently went there for a meeting. This is an untenable situation and cannot be sustained. Something has to give. Pray the transition is smooth.

Email story  Email Story | Discuss story Discuss Story

Back to top

 

This Site Is

Innovesia

Copyright © 2003 South Asia Tribune Publications, L.L.C. All rights reserved.